I am going to buy a nikon 70mm - 200mm f2.8 specifically for low light (no flash because of working with animals) and sports photography but want to make sure I buy the correct one.
I currently own a D3300 and have the AF-S NIKKOR 55-200mm 1:4-5.6F which I love but I feel I have outgrown the lens and although I am a novice and it is only a hobby really, I am selling my photos and being asked to do more and more work but I don't feel the lens is up to it... especially under low light conditions, also would just like the images to be slightly "crisper"
Does anyone have a comparison table for the various models (old vs new and between the different type in the nikon 70mm - 200mm f2.8 range)
eg AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II vs a AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F2.8E FL ED VR vs say older models of a similar lens which might be cheaper but just as good?
My other question is would the AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F2.8E FL ED VR work with a D3300 body?
I want to upgrade my lens first then upgrade the body at a later stage (can't afford to do both similtaneously)
Have heard that I should get a FX (full frame) which should still work on a DX...