Moose, I am looking at a 50mm prime lens as one of my first non-kit lenses for my D3100. I went to our local camera shop and the salesmen suggested the Sigma Normal 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Autofocus lens for Nikon AF, saying it was a better lens than the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.8G lens. I'm looking for some more opinions on this. I'm okay with paying more for a lens if it's worth the difference, but is the Sigma worth the $200 difference for my camera?
Kate
Comments
I can't speak for your Nikon, but a friend has just bought the Canon version. I have the Canon f/1.4 and so we compared performance. The Sigma came out on top in virtually all areas. It focussed faster, was optically superior and gave better bokeh than my Canon. Obviously, you want to hear from Nikon owners, but I hope this helps a little.
Best regards, PBked
I'm looking at getting 50mm lens in the near future, so Kate3e thanks for the question. I will await Moose's reply with interest.
I have been looking at the Nikon f/1.8 and f/1.4 as well as the Sigma f/1.4. At the moment I'm tending to favor the Nikon f/1.4, but I have not yet decided. Here is an interesting review of these lenses which you might find helpful. I hope it's ok to post the link.
If you already have the lens, then you already are well acquainted with the challenge of getting good focus with the small DX screen. If you're shopping for one, be aware that manual focusing can be hit or miss. It's possible to do very well, and the shots will be fine when they're right, but you must take care, and expect a few misses.